Sunday, March 7, 2010

Best Golfers Under 30: Says Who?

Thanks to Janky for inspiring this entry!

It seems like there are as many “best pro golfers under 30" lists as there are commentators (or perhaps even more). An underlying question is: How do we determine the best? It seems that everyone has their own criteria, and their own weighting.

To start off the debate, here are the top 5 pro golfers under 30, courtesy of the Official World Golf Ranking (as of February 28):

1. Martin Kaymer
2. Rory McIlroy
3. Sean O’Hair
4. Camilo Villegas
5. Hunter Mahan

The rankings are based on points given for finishes and field strength, on a two-year cycle, that makes the FedEx Cup system seem crystal-clear; I was a math geek in school and currently deal with data and statistics in “real life”, and I still don’t really understand it, so I won’t venture a more detailed explanation.

But is this system the way to determine “the” list of the best golfers under 30? What about a ranking system for the rest of us? I spent some time looking at those under-30's who are in the top 100 of the world rankings, considering them on the basis of three factors: wins, consistency of performance, and major performances.

Is number of wins the way to rank the best golfers under 30? I think most golf fans would agree, “a win is not always a win”. If number of wins were all that mattered, Japanese teen phenom Ryo Ishikawa would be the best. Ishikawa has seven wins–all in Japan, in events that are by and large much weaker than PGA and European Tour events. How do Martin Kaymer’s five European Tour wins, all in relatively strong events, compare with Charl Schwartzel’s five wins, the two most recent in weaker-field events? Stateside, how would Camilo Villegas’s three PGA Tour wins, all in stronger events, compare with Dustin Johnson’s three wins, one of which came in a Fall Series event? Would a player with two stronger-field events, such as Anthony Kim, be ranked close to or even above a three-win player such as Johnson, if one of those three wins came in a weak-field event?

What about those tournaments that don’t result in a win? How much do top-10 finishes count? Can a winless player with multiple top-10's in any given year, such as Kevin Na or Oliver Wilson, be counted in the “best players” category?

And what about performances in majors? How much does that factor into the ranking, especially since no player currently under age 30 has won a major? Two players currently under 30 had top-10 finishes in two majors in 2009 (Rory McIlroy and Hunter Mahan). Ross Fisher led all four majors in 2009 at one point, but only managed one top-10 finish; how does that compare against McIlroy and Mahan?

For what it’s worth, here is my top 5. I put a lot of weight into wins (qualified by strength of field), followed by performance in majors, top-10 finishes outside of wins, career consistency, and a “what-have-you-done-for-me-lately” factor:

1. Martin Kaymer. 5 wins in relatively strong-field European Tour events, a 6th-place finish in the 2009 PGA Championship, and a win earlier this year in Abu Dhabi.
2. Sean O’Hair. O’Hair gets the nod over other three-win players due in part to seven top-10 finishes in addition to his win at Quail Hollow in 2009. One of those was a 10th at the Masters, and three others were in FedEx Cup playoff events.
3. Camilo Villegas. Villegas definitely has the highest “what-have-you-done-for-me-lately” factor, with a 3rd in the WGC-Accenture Match Play, and 8th in the Waste Management Phoenix Open, and a win at the Honda Classic in the last three weeks. All of his three wins have come in events with relatively strong fields.
4. Dustin Johnson. Johnson is the third player with three PGA Tour wins. He also finished 10th in the 2009 PGA Championship and so far has one win (Pebble Beach) in 2010. He finishes behind Villegas due to his first win being at a weaker-field Fall Series event.
5. Hunter Mahan. This was the toughest one to pick. Mahan gets the nod for several reasons: his win at Phoenix last month earns “what-have-you-done-for-me-lately” points; his six top-10 finishes last year included two majors (10th in the Masters, 6th in the U.S. Open) and one WGC event (4th at Bridgestone); and he’s come through in the clutch at both the Ryder Cup and the President’s Cup recently. Two career wins also put him ahead of McIlroy, who has tremendous upside but one win.

Let the debate begin!

3 comments:

  1. I did a best "30 under 30" ranking awhile ago. I had O'Hair topping that list but now I think I should re-rank them! This is a list that will forever be shuffling between the top few guys. Right now it's hard to argue against the way Villegas is playing

    ReplyDelete
  2. I tried to leave a comment earlier... And if i recall what I said is that I think I would downgrade Kaymer. Despite what he has done in Europe and the strong field events he seems to flail a bit in the states. And I really like the moxy Sean O'Hair showed in bouncing back from his Bay Hill failure to win at Quail Hollow. But to me Mahan is the one who has the chance to be great. He was one bad break away from the US OPEN last year, and he seems to bring his game in all the big events. I remember following him and DJ Trahan a couple groups in front of Tiger at Torrey pines when they were both relatively unknown. Villegas might be ready to really take the next step, the majors will be big for him this year. Clearly, Kim may have the most talent of all of this group. The way he closed in his two wins were impressive. But since then he seems to have forgotten that tournaments are 4 rounds, not 2 or 3. Dustin Johnson gets alot of press, but if we discount his win at Turning Stone, he is a lot like Boo Weekly, winning at the same event twice and not really contending too many other places.

    The one guy you know I am a fan of who is not mentioned here is Brian Gay. His length will always hurt him, but the way he roles the rock will allow him to be a consistent player on the PGA Tour for years.

    JankyT

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great stuff! I'm still bullish on Kaymer, but from a U.S. focus he is somewhat disappointing so far; I'm going to chalk it up to limited experience for now. Just a few weeks ago, I was saying that I didn't see all the fuss about Hunter Mahan, but his win in Phoenix was impressive; if it takes him three more years to get the next one, though, I'll really wonder. I'm still really questioning AK's seriousness; he's looking better this year than last year, but he still doesn't seem to be quite where he was in 2008.

    Brian Gay is definitely underrated. He'd probably be in my second 10 if he were 10 years younger; hard to believe, but he's already 38!

    ReplyDelete